Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Sticky:[118.6] Recurring Opportunity removal - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Rise wrote: Glad you had a good experience with the feature, we will certainly have similar features coming , we just want them to be more integrated with with the rest of our work and be a little more robust overall. I never doubted...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.06.27 14:06:52
|
2. Sticky:Daily Opportunities coming soon - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Solhild wrote: Side1Bu2Rnz9 wrote: Ladies and Gentlemen... you're wasting your breath... CCP doesn't care about the 106 pages of people almost unanimously opposed to this idea. If CCP wants to do it then **** the player base right?? It's CCP...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.05.04 21:56:55
|
3. Sticky:[Citadels] Dreadnoughts - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Larrikin wrote: Rabbit P wrote: anything about the siege (triage also), weapon timer, combat refitting? We need a clear statement about this issue. This is in the patch notes (found here ) Quote: Refitting in space will no longe...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.04.28 16:44:16
|
4. Sticky:[Citadels] Dreadnoughts - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: Are you really posting a thread asking for feedback TWO DAYS before patch day? Is this actually what I'm looking at here? I think you may be mistaken about what the purpose of the "Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback C...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.04.25 22:47:46
|
5. Sticky:[Citadels] Dreadnoughts - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So every single capital and super you've revised has the exact same shield resists. Why?
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.04.25 22:30:40
|
6. Sticky:[Citadels] Supercarriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
The shield resistance profiles for each ship are the same. Why?
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.04.22 02:48:30
|
7. Sticky:[Citadels] Titans - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Is there a reason that they all have the exact same shield resistance profiles?
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.04.22 02:42:17
|
8. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Larrikin wrote: Francisco Vazquez Garcia wrote: Why are all resistance profiles the same? Fixed :) No, the shield resistances are still the same on every ship: Base shield resistances (EM/Therm/Kin/Exp): 0 / 20 / 40 / 50
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.04.20 22:41:15
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Question: If a player with a clean account (no previous bans or whatever) comes forward to use the amnesty program, will his account be flagged so that he cannot trade characters, even though he won't receive a ban?
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.27 20:59:16
|
10. Worries about the skill injectors, and the future of the game. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Reiisha wrote: And the worst... This new feature was supposed to be aimed at newbies mostly, however it's unaffordable for most of them. Worst of all, it's aimed at the kind of player who wants to get to max level, deplete the content, and t...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.18 02:55:31
|
11. Worries about the skill injectors, and the future of the game. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: ... I've also been with EVE for 13 years, ironically my first reaction to skillpoint trading was negative too, but it was a knee-jerk reaction from a 13 year veteran of the game who thought a change so fundamental would destro...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.18 02:54:43
|
12. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Hey everyone. The actual DCU feedback has been a bit challenging to sift out of the ganking debate, but I want to make it clear that the IFFA fitting requirements in the OP are not a typo. It's intentional that the new compac...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.14 21:49:32
|
13. Sticky:[March] Cap Batteries - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Thanks for the feedback so far! We agree with many of you that the fitting costs in this first pass were still too high. I had decreased the CPU costs compared to the TQ versions but I spent too much focus on comparing to thei...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.14 21:39:54
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
SurrenderMonkey wrote: Nevyn Auscent wrote: Alexis Nightwish wrote: Maybe I'm misremembering but I thought they said at some point that citadels won't auto-defend - someone will have to actually "pilot" them for combat purposes. So, ther...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.14 02:13:10
|
15. [ECM] Revise jamming? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Khan Wrenth wrote: Alexis Nightwish wrote: (stuff I said) (stuff you said) First, lol@"7-star rats" Second, the Gnosis is the Jove BC which is why I listed it. Jove ships have all four sensors. Third, what would I do? Well I've though...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.14 01:59:30
|
16. [ECM] Revise jamming? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I don't like the idea in general (mainly because it's counter-intuitive and doesn't solve the real issue with ECM: it's binary nature), but the biggest problem is this: I've been radar jammed! Can I still target Mobile Depots? MTUs? Stations? Sta...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.13 02:51:57
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: Skills, Modules and Refitting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Syri Taneka wrote: Alexis Nightwish wrote: CCP you are hearby charged with two counts of complete and utter bullshit. Count 1; Special snowflake status for carrier pilots. CCP Larrikin wrote: Force Auxiliaries will instead use a renamed...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.12 23:27:00
|
18. Announcement:February release - Issues feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Big Bob Watts wrote: Tracking doesn't work on the old camera anymore. After disabling the new camera make sure that whatever key you want for tracking is set correctly: Shortcuts > Navigation > Tracking Camera: Toggle point camera to s...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.12 22:50:36
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
SurrenderMonkey wrote: Alexis Nightwish wrote: Dev Blog wrote: Prevent some poor soul from having to stay forever locked inside a Citadel to provide skill-level related bonuses (then literally in the next paragraph) We are still g...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.12 22:35:01
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: Alright, update regarding the stront numbers: We're going to decrease required stront numbers from 400 to 200 for a batch of 40 fuel blocks. Stront volume is being decreased from 3 to 2m3. Stront consumption of t...
- by Alexis Nightwish - at 2016.02.12 22:21:20
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |